Tuesday, March 27, 2012

Rouge Park - Toronto/.Ajax Area

http://ca.news.yahoo.com/blogs/dailybrew/rouge-park-toronto-gives-parks-canada-high-hopes-183113888.html

It gives me a bit of hope that if a large City like Toronto can see the light of saving an area for park, rather than filling it up with buildings, perhaps our own City of Whitehorse, who claims it is a wilderness city, will also see the light, and look else where to develop residential areas, rather than destroying middle McIntyre Creek.

We can hope, and work together to succeed.

FAQ - Middle McIntyre Creek & Porter Creek D Subdivision


1. What is McIntyre Creek?

McIntyre Creek is a creek that runs northeast from its headwaters on Mount McIntyre across Whitehorse, just north of the Yukon College, and into the Yukon River.

2. What is Middle McIntyre Creek?

Middle McIntyre Creek is the area of land bounded by the Alaska Highway, the existing Porter Creek neighbourhood, Mountainview Drive and Yukon College. The area is approximately 439 hectares in size. McIntyre Creek flows northeast across this area of land.

3. Who are the Friends of McIntyre Creek (FOMC)?

The Friends of McIntyre Creek (FOMC) is composed of a group of local people dedicated to maintaining the ecological quality of McIntyre Creek in the face of development pressures, and ensuring that the needs of wildlife and natural systems are balanced with recreational and environmental education opportunities in the area.

4. What kind of development is the City of Whitehorse proposing in Middle McIntyre Creek?

The City of Whitehorse is proposing to develop a 200-300 unit subdivision, Porter Creek-D, on approximately 80 hectares of land along the north side of McIntyre Creek. In addition, the City is proposing to build two collector roads through the area: i) the Pine Street Extension, which would run south from Pine Street across McIntyre Creek and then west to the Alaska Highway and ii) the Whistle Bend Connector, which would connect Mountainview Drive with the Pine Street Extension.

5. Why do FOMC and others want to protect Middle McIntyre Creek from development?

FOMC and others want to protect the ecological, recreational and educational values of Middle McIntyre Creek. McIntyre Creek and its associated wetlands and forests has been identified as the largest contiguous Significant Wildlife Area within Whitehorse, providing habitat and a travel corridor for a diversity of wildlife. A subdivision and roads in Middle McIntyre Creek would intensify and concentrate human use of the area and the accompanying light, air, water and noise pollution would not only impact wildlife use of and movement through the area but also reduce the quality of recreational and educational experiences for all time. Many other cities in Canada are seeing the benefits of preserving wild spaces in their interiors despite development pressure; FOMC feels that the long term benefits to quality of life from preserving the ecological functions of McIntyre Creek far outweigh the benefits of the proposed Porter Creek-D subdivision.

6. Why can’t the city have both a subdivision and greenspace in Middle McIntyre Creek?

Middle McIntyre Creek is approximately 439 hectares in size. Of those 439 hectares, 93 hectares are designated Institutional/Yukon College and 0.3 hectares are First Nations lands. About 80 hectares of the 439 hectares is proposed for the Porter Creek-D subdivision. However, this 80 hectares does not include the land that will be needed for roads and other infrastructure which would greatly increase the physical footprint of development. In addition, the impacts of the Porter Creek-D subdivision and accompanying roads would extend beyond the 80+ hectare physical footprint to affect not only wildlife use of the area but people’s enjoyment of the remaining greenspace.

6. Middle McIntyre Creek was designated for residential development a long time ago – why shouldn’t the land be developed?

The reason why Middle McIntyre Creek has remained undeveloped for so long despite designation is because unresolved questions about the College Endowment Lands and strong public opposition have stopped the City every time they have moved to develop the land. The Official Community Plan (OCP) guides decision making to ensure a balance is struck between development and conservation. The OCP is not a static document; changes can and should be made to reflect the desires of Whitehorse residents.

7. There is a housing shortage in Whitehorse - don’t we need a subdivision in Middle McIntyre Creek?

The proposed Porter Creek-D subdivision would be unlikely to address the need for affordable, high density housing in Whitehorse. Furthermore, population growth in Whitehorse is hard to predict given the fluctuating mining economy; the city should focus on creating tax incentives to stimulate development of vacant downtown lots and infilling areas that are already serviced by roads and utilities, including Whistle Bend, which will eventually provide homes for 8000 people.

8. Middle McIntyre Creek is already impacted by human activities – doesn’t it make sense to build there?

Existing disturbances in the Middle McIntyre Creek area are concentrated on the south side of the creek and include infrastructure like power line right of ways, the pumphouse and dirt roads. However, the land that will be directly impacted by the proposed Porter Creek-D subdivision is on the north side of the creek, is largely forested and contains a number of popular walking trails. Existing disturbed land in the area can be restored through revegetation projects like the one conducted by the Yukon Fish and Game Association near the Pumphouse Pond in the fall of 2011.

10. Doesn’t the city need roads through Middle McIntyre Creek to handle the increased traffic from Whistle Bend?

Roads through Middle McIntyre Creek would divert traffic from Porter Creek and Whistle Bend to the Alaska Highway - this will not solve the real problem of traffic bottlenecks in the downtown core. Instead, Mountainview Drive should be widened earlier than planned and incentives put in place for carpooling, public transit and active transportation.

Questions? Contact the Yukon Conservation Society 668-5678

Saturday, March 17, 2012

March 17, 2012 - Updates


Things have been progressing behind the scenes, but nothing much to be updated to the membership. However some new things you might be interested in are:

1. We have a presence on facebook now

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Friends-of-McIntryre-Creek/274419815927266

2. We are working on a web page, and will let you know when it is up and running. If you have any suggestions or ideas of what you would like to see on the web, please send us an email at

friendsofmcintyre@gmail.com

with Web Suggestions as the subject matter.

3. The Takhini Association community group that are also interested in protecting middle McIntyre Creek from development, have printed some bumper stickers, and window cards saying

Friend of McIntyre Creek.

If you would like to place one in your business window, your home, or the bumper of your vehicle, please pick them up at Yukon Conservation Society office at 302 Hawkins Street in Whitehorse.

I have to apologize for not keeping this blog updated as frequently as I would have liked, but have been dealing with personal medical issues since October 2011 which have taken priority. I hope to keep it more current in future.



Gerry

Thursday, December 15, 2011

Merry Christmas Everyone!

A cartoon published in the paper. It would be funny if it wasn't so close to the truth!

Letter to Council from Mike Tribes, Porter Creek Resident

Supporters of McIntyre Creek need to get involved by sending letters to the City Council, and the newspapers, to keep up the pressure to protect the McIntyre Creek wildlife corridor.

If you read the comments below, you will see that again the deck is being stacked so the City gets the answers it wants, without being open to the possibility that Porter Creek D will not be developed.

Thanks to Mike Tribe for this letter.

"I want to thank the City Council for hearing input from concerned citizens and various groups.

I especially want to thank Councillors Cameron, Irwin, and Pillai for recognizing that a communication breakdown occured during the working group meetings, and that the process needed to be fixed. Councillors Stockdale and Roberts offered encouragement by suggesting that we move ahead with this preliminary phase and answer a lot of questions, so we can proceed to make a decision, and that development is not a done deal.

After reading the PC-D Subdivision Development Agreement between YTG and the city, I noticed some things that are of particular concern, that make me question whether or not this is a done deal.

On page 1

Whereas: B. the Parties have agreed in principle that the area known as Porter Creek D... is developable land for a residential neighbourhood and wish for the planning and public consultation process that will lead to development of this area to proceed.

Whereas: E. the Parties have agreed that all planning work undertaken to develop lost must be 100% recovered from the sale of such lots.

This suggests to me that the basic terms of reference of the agreement suggest that the city and YTG want the development to occur, and the planning and public consultation will lead to development of the area, and that all costs will be 100% recoverable.

Councillor Roberts: If development does not occur, which you promised is a valid outcome, how will the $420,000 cost be recovered, as stated in this agreement? And why does section B say planning will lead to development?

The document also says under responsibilities, item 2.2:

The Planning, feasibility and subdivision approval exercise will result in:
  • An Environmental Assessment decision document that supports the Porter Creek D subdivision development; and
  • an approved subdivision plan for the phased development.
This item also suggest that there will be an approved subdivision plan. This sounds like a done deal. There is no "if" in this clause. Apparently YESAB will approve development and an approved subdivision plan will be produced.

Under resposibilities, item 2.5:

The detailed engineering design and tender documents exercise will result in:
  • Development of the Porter Creek D Subdivision
Again this raises the fear that development is a done deal.

I understand the sense of urgency to push ahead with this. Section 6.0, Schedule says the detailed design of the development can commence no later than December 2011. Was it this clause that was driving the pressure to not restore the faith in the City's consulting process, in delaying a decision by 6 weeks?

And while I have faith in the promises made by Councillors Roberts and Stockdale that development is not a forgone conclusion, and that this is just predesign, will those commitments supercede this Subdivision Planning Agreement, which commits to cost recovery, should it be decided that development not go ahead?

Thanks for listening.

Mike Tribes
Porter Creek Resident"

Thursday, December 8, 2011

Let's Fill the Room on December 12th!

Hello Friends of McIntyre Creek,

Another big meeting is approaching: on Monday, December 12th, 2011, City Council will be making the decision whether to give the go-ahead for further planning of the proposed developments in Middle McIntyre Creek. City Council needs to keep getting the strong message that we say No! to Porter Creek-D and the connector roads - we need everybody out on Monday!

The meeting will be held at 7:30 pm in Council Chambers, City Hall. If you would like to make a presentation, you must pre-register with the City Clerk at 668-8621.

Despite the weather this past Monday, we had a great turnout at the City Council Meeting and a number of very good presentations. Since that meeting, an Administrative Report has been made available by City Planners that summarizes and responds to the concerns that have been raised. If you want a copy, or you have questions or comments, call Christina at 668-5678. We're currently drafting a response to this Administrative Report which will be circulated shortly.

See you all on December 12th!

Tuesday, December 6, 2011

NEWS Release Dec. 10-11

NDP to Table McIntyre Creek Petition in the Legislature

The New Democratic Party is tabling a petition about McIntyre Creek in the legislature
tomorrow. The petition calls for the Yukon government to protect Middle McIntyre Creek
and oppose development proposals in the area.

The Friends of McIntyre Creek, Yukon Conservation Society, Porter Creek Community
Association and Takhini North Community Association have been circulating the petition
since Nov. 3rd.

“Our MLA Kate White strongly supported protecting Middle McIntyre Creek during the
territorial election, so we were happy to accept her offer to table the petition in the
legislature,” said Takhini North Community Association President Noel Sinclair.

221 signatures were signed in hard copy and 145 signatures were obtained through an
online petition, for a total of 366.

“These signatures show significant support for protecting this well loved recreational
and wildlife area,” said YCS Executive Director Karen Baltgailis. “The vast majority of
the public input to the City’s consultation process about the proposed developments
also calls for the area to be protected from roads and houses.”